wp19d19743.png

© 2010 Dr. Russell O. Schub, P.A.

wp1b6572e7_0f.jpg
wp8cd4f7ec.png
wp036ead3f.png
wp0e4394f7.png
wpbba55d43.png

The effectiveness of colonoscopy in successfully detecting polyps depends on a number of factors, including the technical expertise and experience of the endoscopist.  A number of quality indicators have been suggested to measure competence in performing colonoscopy.  Dr. Schub has performed over 25,000 colonoscopies, and is dedicated to meeting these recognized standards.  To that end, we analyzed 295 of our charts from 2008 to determine how Dr. Schub’s performance compares to national guidelines.  

Here are the results:


 

 

 

How do Dr. Schub’s colonoscopy results compare to national standards?

Quality Indicator #1:  Completeness of Exam

National Benchmark

Dr. Schub

 

Effective colonoscopists should be able to “intubate” the cecum (i.e., successfully pass the colonoscope to established landmarks at the beginning of the colon) in ≥90% of all cases, and in ≥95% of cases when screening a healthy adult.

≥90% of all cases

 

≥95%  when screening a healthy adult

99.7% of all cases

 

100%  when screening a healthy adult

Quality Indicator #2:  Adenoma Detection

National Benchmark

Dr. Schub

 

Among healthy, asymptomatic patients 50 years or older undergoing screening colonoscopy, adenomas should be detected in ≥25% of men and ≥15% of women.

≥25% of men

 

≥15% of women

32% of men

 

18% of women

Quality Indicator #3:  Length of Exam

National Benchmark

Dr. Schub

 

Mean withdrawal times in colonoscopic examinations should be ≥6 minutes in colonoscopies performed in patients with intact colons.

≥6 min in patients with intact colons

>6 min in patients with intact colons

Reference:

Rex, D., Deal, S., Petersen, B. & Irving, P. (2006). Quality indicators for colonoscopy.  Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 63, 4, S16-S28.

 

 

Many thanks to our student intern Lauren Oglesby for her dedicated work collecting and analyzing this data.  

wp1f4e9905.png
wp1f4e9905.png